Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] TXOP bandwidth signaling (1281r2)

Thank you, Kaiying :)

Regards,
Edward

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 4:56 PM Kaiying Lu <Kaiying.Lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Edward,

 

Sorry for the confusion. I meant that I will delete the subclause 9.3.1.8.1 in my draft text. I will update 1281r3 after some further offline discussions on other comments.

 

Thanks,

Kaiying

 

From: Edward Au [mailto:edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 12:53 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] TXOP bandwidth signaling (1281r2)

 

Hell Kaiying,

 

Thanks!   Based on your comment, may I know if the following is the only sentence you would like to add to subclause 9.3.1.8,1?

 

In a BlockAck frame transmitted by an EHT STA in a non-HT duplicate format with bandwidth greater than 160/80+80 MHz, the TBD field carries the TXVECTOR parameter EXTENDED_CH_BANDWIDTH_IN_NON_HT and the TA field value is a bandwidth signalling TA. 

 

Regards,
Edward 

 

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:18 PM Kaiying Lu <Kaiying.Lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Edward,

 

Thanks for your comments.

 

As Alfred mentioned during the call, HT-delayed block ack is deprecated. So I don’t think I need to add anything for 9.3.1.8.1 BA frame format.

Actually REVmd draft 4.0 should remove the second sentence.

 “In a BlockAck frame transmitted in the context of (#4439)non-HT duplicate format and where the scrambling sequence carries the TXVECTOR parameter CH_BANDWIDTH_IN_NON_HT, the TA field value is a bandwidth signaling TA(#4439).”

 

Best regards,

Kaiying

 

 

 

From: Edward Au [mailto:edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:18 PM
To: Kaiying Lu
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx; Liwen Chu; Jeongki Kim; Ganming (Ming); Duncan Ho
Subject: TXOP bandwidth signaling (1281r2)

 

Hello Kaiying,

 

In 20/1281r2, one of your instruction to the editor is to modify the following subclause 9.3.1.8.1 (based on IEEE 802.11ax Draft 7.0):

 

The TA field value is the address of the STA transmitting the BlockAck frame or a bandwidth signaling TA in the context of HT-delayed block ack. In a BlockAck frame transmitted in the context of HT-delayed block ack by a VHT STA or an HE STA or an EHT STA in a non-HT or non-HT duplicate format and where the scrambling sequence carries the TXVECTOR parameter CH_BANDWIDTH_IN_NON_HT, the TA field value is a bandwidth signaling TA. In a BlockAck frame transmitted by an EHT STA in a non-HT duplicate format with bandwidth greater than 160/80+80 MHz, the TBD field carries the TXVECTOR parameter EXTENDED_CH_BANDWIDTH_IN_NON_HT and the TA field value is a bandwidth signalling TA.

 

In REVmd Draft 4.0, however, the above-mentioned paragraph is shortened that no VHT STA and non-HT format are mentioned - see below:

 

The TA field value is the address of the STA transmitting the BlockAck frame(#4439)(#1512). In a BlockAck frame transmitted in the context of (#4439)non-HT duplicate format and where the scrambling sequence carries the TXVECTOR parameter CH_BANDWIDTH_IN_NON_HT, the TA field value is a bandwidth signaling TA(#4439).

 

Do you think you still need to modify 9.3.1.8.1 because of the recent update in REVmd Draft 4.0?

Thanks and Regards,
Edward

 

 

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:36 AM Kaiying Lu <Kaiying.Lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred, Liwen and Jeongki,

 

I would also like to add 1281r1 PDT-MAC-TXOP-Bandwidth-Signaling” to the MAC agenda.

 

Thanks,

Kaiying

 

From: Kaiying Lu
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 12:00 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx'; Edward AU; 'Liwen Chu'; 'Jeongki Kim'
Cc: Ganming (Ming); 'Duncan Ho'
Subject: Request to add a SP to MAC agenda

 

Hi Alfred, Liwen and Jeongki,

 

Since I forgot to mention that “MLO-Multi-link group addressed data delivery” is in R1 during last joint call, could you please add the following SP to the MAC queue?

 

SP: Do you support to change the spec text R1/R2 status of the three items under “MLO-Multi-link group addressed data delivery” to “R1”?

 

Thanks,

Kaiying

 

 

From: Akhmetov, Dmitry [mailto:Dmitry.Akhmetov@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 7:32 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Request to add deferred SP to MAC agenda

 

Hi Alfred, Liwen, Jeongki,

 

Could you please add SP of contribution 993r7 to the MAC queue?

 

Dmitry

 

 

From: Akhmetov, Dmitry
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 5:20 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Request to add deferred SP to MAC agenda

 

 

Hi Alfred, Liwen, Jeongki,

 

Could you please add SP of contribution 993r5 to the MAC queue?

 

Thanks,

 

Dave

 

 

From: Akhmetov, Dmitry
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 6:50 AM
To: Alfred Asterjadhi <aasterja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Request to add deferred SP to MAC agenda

 

Hi Alfred,

 

Could you please help add the SP of contribution 993r4 to the MAC agenda,

 

Thanks, Dmitry

 

From: Akhmetov, Dmitry
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 10:18 AM
To: Alfred Asterjadhi <aasterja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Request to add deferred SP to MAC agenda

 

Hi Alfred,

 

Can you please help add the deferred SP of contribution 993r3 to the MAC agenda?

 

Thanks,

Dmitry

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 

*********** MEDIATEK Confidentiality Notice
 ***********
The information contained in this e-mail message (including any 
attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or 
otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is 
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any 
use, dissemination, distribution, printing, retaining or copying 
of this e-mail (including its attachments) by unintended recipient(s) 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not an 
intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe that you have received 
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately 
(by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of this 
e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not 
disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank you!


 

--

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 

*********** MEDIATEK Confidentiality Notice ***********
The information contained in this e-mail message (including any 
attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or 
otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is 
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any 
use, dissemination, distribution, printing, retaining or copying 
of this e-mail (including its attachments) by unintended recipient(s) 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not an 
intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe that you have received 
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately 
(by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of this 
e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not 
disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank you!

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1