Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [EXTERNAL] Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT for NS/EP Priority Access



Sounds good. 

Matthew Fischer
Nice Guy
Broadcom Inc.
+1 408 543 3370 office


On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:13 PM Das, Subir <sdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello Matt,

Thanks for your comments and suggested changes.

We will address them in next version and get back to you.

 

Regards,

_Subir

 

From: Matthew Fischer <00000959766b2ff5-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 11:37 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE]
答复: [EXTERNAL] Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT for NS/EP Priority Access

 

Subir,

 

Please see comments and suggested changes in the attached file.

 

 

Matthew Fischer

Nice Guy

Broadcom Inc.

+1 408 543 3370 office

 

 

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:31 AM Yangbo (Boyce, 2012 NT Lab) <yangbo59@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Subir,

 

I add some comments, pls find it in attached files

 

Regards

Boyce Yangbo

 

发件人: Das, Subir [mailto:sdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2020911 0:49
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] [EXTERNAL] Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT for NS/EP Priority Access

 

Hello Edward,

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I was not aware of it. I did discuss with my co-authors and also received suggestions from the TTT members.

We have decided to replace ‘NS/EP’ with ‘NSEP’. We will reflect this in the next revision and also add a note in Clause 4.5.x since the forward slash is used in other standards.

 

Regards,

_Subir

 

From: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 8:46 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT for NS/EP Priority Access

 

Hello Subir,

 

Thanks for your contribution.

 

In REVmd, we try to minimize the use of slash (e.g., see CID 4216 in REVmd).  It is because we have received comments that slashes are usually confusing - different people may have different interpretations, such as or, and, or even xor.   Do you think we can replace the slash between NS and EP with an appropriate conjunction?

 

Regards,

Edward

 

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 9:49 PM Das, Subir <sdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello TTT members for NS/EP Priority Access,

I have posted the initial draft text for your review and inputs.

 

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1434-00-00be-pdt-for-ns-ep-priority-access.docx

 

Regards,

-Subir


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1


 

--


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature