Hi Ross
Thank you for the comments.
Please see my response in red
below
When the discussion is done, I will share the updated version.
Regards,
Yujin
From: Yujian (Ross Yu) <ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 4:49 PM
To: Yujin Noh <yujin.noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 答复: PDT review on PHY Parameters for EHT-MCSs
Hi Yujin,
Thanks for preparing the PDTs.
For some MRUs where DCM is not supported. You may use Not valid instead of Reserved, similar as before:
è It is a very good point because I thought we might need the discussion whether it should be “Not Valid”
or “Reserved”. In 11ac, Not valid is shown because Ndbps is not a integer. But here in 11be, things seem different because we have just decided not to support. So in that way, Reserved might be a good option. Any thoughts? It makes sense to use “Not valid”
in one way as you mentioned.
One more suggestions, could you add sub-titles for different RU sizes, similar as 11ax. Since there are many tables, it would be friendly for reads to find the exact
table:
è Then it would have only one table for each subclause. Since the comment is still valid, I will update it.
regards
于健 Ross Jian Yu
Huawei Technologies
发件人:
Yujin Noh [mailto:yujin.noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2021年1月27日 6:15
收件人:
STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT review on PHY Parameters for EHT-MCSs
Dear all,
Please find the draft of PDT TBD on PHY Parameters for EHT-MCSs.
Remaining TBDs in this subclause would be covered by DUP mode PDT.
If you have any comments, please let me know.
Regards,
Yujin
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1