| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Xiandong and Tomo, Thanks for sharing your opinions. Since both ways could work, and not affect the technical design. Let’s try to run a SP, and follows the majority
people’s preference. Regards, Yunbo 发件人: Tomo Adachi [mailto:tomo.adachi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hi all,
My opinion is to select the definition that will be often used in the draft.
If _expression_ like
“an NSTR MLD
with all enabled link pairs being STR”
will be repeated, I think it’s
better to include the concept of enabled and disabled in the definition. Best regards, tomo From:
董贤东
<0000120bd98e7489-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Yunbo, I have same understanding with Young Hoon, thanks. Best Regards Xiandong Dong 发件人: Liyunbo <liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Young Hoon, Thanks for sharing your opinion. I agree with you. Regards, Yunbo 发件人: Young Hoon Kwon [mailto:younghoon.kwon@xxxxxxx]
Hi Yunbo, In my opinion, “STR vs NSTR” is a capability signaling, and “disablement vs enablement” of a link can be changed based on operational signaling. So, linking STR/NSTR to enabled/disabled links may not be appropriate. Thanks, Young Hoon From: Liyunbo <liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Tomo, Thanks for sharing your opinion. I more prefer “an
MLD for which all link pairs are STR”, but don’t have a strong opinion. Main reason is it will not change from NSTR MLD to STR MLD (or vice versa, from STR MLD
to NSTR MLD) due to the enable or disable of some of the links. We can see other people’s opinion. Regards, Yunbo 发件人:
tomo.adachi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tomo.adachi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hi Yunbo,
Which one will you take? The first one, i.e.,
“an MLD for
which all link pairs are STR”? With the enabled and disabled links existing, I would prefer the second one, i.e.,
“an MLD for
which all enabled link pairs are STR”.
Best regards, tomo From: Liyunbo <liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Matt, Thanks for the suggestion. It is more cleaner. If no comments from other person, I will update it in next revision. Regards, Yunbo 发件人: Matthew Fischer [mailto:matthew.fischer@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Yunbo, Suggested improved wording: Change: an MLD with all of its link pairs of the associated links are STR to: an MLD for which all link pairs are STR and for the other option: an MLD for which all enabled link pairs are STR Matthew Fischer Nice Guy Broadcom Inc. +1 408 543 3370 office On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:15 AM Liyunbo <liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |