Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] BFRP discussion

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Ross,

Thank you for your careful drawing.

The first BFRP is mandatory, but the second one is optional. So I slightly prefer the original one.

But I’m okay with that because it just shows an example of sounding sequence.

I’ll add the below figure in r3 and let’s show members both of them in Joint CC.

Best regards,

Jinyoung

From: Yujian (Ross Yu) [mailto:00001792b51ef4ea-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2022 4:49 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] BFRP discussion

Hi Jinyoung,

For Figure 35-29, can we also have another example like below? The visio file is within the attached docx.

regards

于健 Ross Jian Yu

Huawei Technologies

发件人: 천진영 [mailto:jiny.chun@xxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2022年1月13日 9:00
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] BFRP discussion

Hi,

Yesterday, I’ve presented 21/2013 (CRs for 35.5.3) and members want more discussion by email. So I make this email thread.

The addressed issue is that:

Currently, the same STA can’t be re-polled but the other STAs can be polled by additional BFRP Trigger in the same TXOP.

So the current figure has some problem.

So I’d like to remove the word ‘One or more sequences’ and make some changes the BFRP explanation as below.

BFRP Trigger frames sent within an EHT TB sounding sequence shall solicit EHT TB PPDUs. (move from other place)

An EHT beamformer that has initiated an EHT TB sounding sequence may send ~~another~~ more than one BFRP Trigger frame in the same TXOP ~~as shown in Figure 35-29 (An illustration of EHT TB sounding).~~

Please give me your opinions or good directions for the CR.

Best regards,

Jinyoung

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1