Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Abhi, Yes, how to set the fields in Multi-Link element is described elsewhere, so the Note is not needed. I you want to make it clear that the sentence is for describing the BSS and not a reported BSS for MLO, you can add (it transmits “outside the Multi-Link element”), but it’s already quite clear as the sentence says “to include the channel
width it is capable of supporting”. Note that maybe the sentence is not fully right when using MBSSID (something to check). Thanks Laurent From: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Yongho, Laurent, All, During yesterday's TGbe MAC call, I proposed the following resolution for CID 13863 in doc 11-22/1978.
There were some concerns expressed about the new paragraph (sentence related to reported STA – highlighted in the snippet below). I am fine to delete the new (highlighted) paragraph since clause 35.3.3 provides guidance on the conditions for inclusion and contents of a per-STA profile for a reported STA. Clause 35.15 can focus on the contents of the transmitting (i.e., reporting) STA’s frame. Could you please let me know if the removal of the new paragraph addresses your concerns and/or if you have other suggestions? CID 13863 included for reference:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |