Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] CID 13863 in doc 11-22/1978

Hi Laurent,

Thank you for your email.

There two issue that we need to address with respect to the current sentence in the spec (note the sentence is a ‘shall’):

  1. An EHT STA that is a STA 6G does not include HT/VHT Cap IE. An EHT STA that is not a STA 6G does not include HE 6 GHz Band Cap IE.
  2. An EHT STA includes the IEs for a reported STA based on the reported STA’s capabilities.
    1. Note, MBSSID case is not an issue since Op/Cap IEs are common to the set (i.e., not carried in the nonTxBSSID profile).


The revised the text to capture the intention. Please let me know if you have additional inputs.

Regards,
Abhi

 

From: Cariou, Laurent <laurent.cariou@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2023 2:25 AM
To: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: CID 13863 in doc 11-22/1978

 

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

Hi Abhi,

Yes, how to set the fields in Multi-Link element is described elsewhere, so the Note is not needed.

I you want to make it clear that the sentence is for describing the BSS and not a reported BSS for MLO, you can add (it transmits “outside the Multi-Link element”), but it’s already quite clear as the sentence says “to include the channel width it is capable of supporting”. Note that maybe the sentence is not fully right when using MBSSID (something to check).

 

Thanks

Laurent

 

From: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 6, 2023 6:30 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] CID 13863 in doc 11-22/1978

 

Hi Yongho, Laurent, All,

During yesterday's TGbe MAC call, I proposed the following resolution for CID 13863 in doc 11-22/1978.

There were some concerns expressed about the new paragraph (sentence related to reported STA – highlighted in the snippet below).

I am fine to delete the new (highlighted) paragraph since clause 35.3.3 provides guidance on the conditions for inclusion and contents of a per-STA profile for a reported STA.

Clause 35.15 can focus on the contents of the transmitting (i.e., reporting) STA’s frame.

Could you please let me know if the removal of the new paragraph addresses your concerns and/or if you have other suggestions?

CID 13863 included for reference:

13863

Sanghyun Kim

35.16.1

531.41

When the EHT STA transmits the Supported Channel Width Set subfield in the Per-STA profile corresponding to the other STA, the subfield shall be set in consideration of the capabilities of the other STA.

As in comment.


Regards,
Abhi

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation SAS (French simplified joint stock company)
Registered headquarters: "Les Montalets"- 2, rue de Paris,
92196 Meudon Cedex, France
Registration Number:  302 456 199 R.C.S. NANTERRE
Capital: 5 208 026.16 Euros

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1