Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Yanjun, Could you defer this CR document and arrange a call to have more discussion on it? Please let me know which time is good for you. Regards Guogang Huang 发件人: Yanjun Sun [mailto:yanjuns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hi Alfred and all, I’ve updated the CR to
23/728r2 based on two constructive feedbacks received offline:
If there is no other comment/concern on the CR, I’d like to queue the SP for this CR in the joint queue. Thanks Yanjun From: Yanjun Sun <yanjuns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi folks, During today’s joint session, we’ve recapped the issue, candidate solutions and prior spec text in
23/728r1 as in the highlighted summary below.
It’ll help the group make progress if you could share any suggestion on alternative solutions or any change to the proposed spec text in the CR.
Discussion for CID 18183:
Issue: for TPE indicating an EIRP, there is no normative text on how to interpret reserved values for the Maximum Transmit
Power Count subfield, so the behavior of a legacy STA is unknown if any value between 4-7 is used
To avoid interop issues with the legacy STAs deployed in the field, the group has discussed two options in the past:
The text in 728r1 is copied from
22/1482r7
based on option1. Thanks Yanjun To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |