Hello,
> On your #1 below, I also think we can forget about the VHT rules now in 11be and just get rid of this paragraph.
I would not delete the 622.10 para shown below, unless we have text
that ensures the condition can never happen.
Brian has been working on making the wording of this BF stuff consistent
across the various
PHYs. We should ensure EHT doesn't introduce
unnecessary divergence.
> On your #2 - not following, of course an AP will not exceed the maximum PPDU duration, why do we need to mention it?
I think it's worth being clear that the max PPDU duration is a constraint.
I wouldn't object to this just being a NOTE, however.
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk
From: Ron
Porat <000009a0da80e877-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, 13 June 2023 00:36
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] CID 15580
Hi Zinan,
Thanks much for working on this CID resolution.
On your #1 below, I also think we can forget about the VHT rules now in 11be and just get rid of this paragraph.
On your #2 - not following, of course an AP will not exceed the maximum PPDU duration, why do we need to mention it?
Thanks,
Ron
From: Zinan Lin <000019c80da359b9-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2023 11:56 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] CID 15580
Hi Youhan et al,
Thanks for your discussions and suggestions to the resolutions of CID 15580.
There are some difference between your suggestions and the proposed solutions:
- I do not think we need to delete the paragraph (starting P622L10 in 802.11be D3.1). Because the similar paragraph
has been existing in Rules for VHT sounding protocol sequences (REVme D3.0 10.35.5.3,
P2043L4).
- The paragraph you suggested to add from 26.5.2.2.2 (REVme
D3.0
P3862L54) does not emphasize to follow the maximum PPDU duration. That is why I made some modifications as below, i.e., “without exceeding the maximum PPDU duration”
is added to the paragraph.
CID 15580, 17074
|
CID |
Clause |
P.L |
Comment |
Proposed Change |
Resolution |
|
15580 |
35.7.3 |
616.10 |
If neither the EHT compressed beamforming report information nor the EHT MU exclusive beamforming report information is included, what shall be included in this case? |
Add text describing what shall be included or what shall be done in such a case. |
Revised. Agree with the comment in principle.
Per discussions within the group, the paragraph is copied from 26.5.2.2.2 (REVme D3.0 P3862L54) and “without exceeding the maximum PPDU duration” is added. TGbe editor: make change in THIS DOCUMENT with tag 15580 |
|
17074 |
35.7.3 |
616.10 |
"An EHT beamformee that transmits EHT compressed beamforming feedback shall include neither the EHT |
Follow baseline |
Accepted |
Please let me know if you have any questions/comments.
Copy to the 11be reflector for everyone’s knowledge about this change.
Thank you very much for your help with resolving this CID.
Best regards,
Zinan
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
|
|
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1