Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear Jouni,It is great that you have a comment on P802.11bh/D5.0. I just read the ANA report and it is correct that we, P802.11be, should use 16 - 19. I will revert back the changes and hope that your comment in IEEE 802.11bh can be accepted.Regards,
EdwardOn Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 8:22 AM Jouni Malinen <jkmalinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:This does not match the ANA database. Why would amendment order override what ANA has already assigned?Furthermore, the P802.11be values 16-19 have already been deployed in significant number of devices and it is not realistic to expect those deployed devices to be modified. Yes, I understand that drafts may change and have such disclaimers, but there is really no justification for doing this change at this point in time taken into account that existing ANA allocation.I have an open comment against P802.11bh/D5.0 to fix the assigned values to match the ANA database.- JouniOn Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 7:53 AM Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Dear Alfred and all,Because of the 11bh and 11be alignment, the data type value of KDE selectors (Table 12-10) will be updated as follows.In 11bh D5.0, it hasIn 11be future draft, we will have:
Regards,Edward
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1