Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] SP text for 11-22/0328r0 (Discussion on Threshold

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Claudio,

Thank you for quick prompt.

Regarding your first comment, I am trying to use less words to avoid confusion. How about changing the sentence to “The computation of CSI variation should be based on this reference metric.”? It is similar to say “The computation of CQI should be based on averaged SNR”.

Regarding your second question, I believe it should informative. I am not sure where we should put it. Again, using CQI as an example, I am copying the sub-clause below from REVme, which describes the relationship between reported CQI and SNR (reference metric). Of course, we all know what SNR is. If we can make the reference metric clear enough in a few sentences, showing an example definitely will help.

9.4.1.67 HE CQI Report field(11ax)

The HE CQI Report field carries the per-RU average SNRs of each space-time stream, where each per-RU

average SNR is the arithmetic mean of the SNR in decibels over a 26-tone RU for which the feedback is

being requested. The HE CQI Report field contains information about the quality of the link.

Best regards,

Ray

From: Claudio Da Silva <claudiodasilva@xxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:05 AM
To: Rui Yang <Rui.Yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: SP text for 11-22/0328r0 (Discussion on Threshold-based Sensing)

Thanks, Rui. Two comments:

It looks like the note in your text is incomplete (“… is based upon”?).
Would the reference metric be included in the amendment as informative (that is, an example of a metric that could be implemented – say in a note or an appendix) or as normative?

Thanks,

Claudio

From: Rui Yang <Rui.Yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 8:00 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] SP text for 11-22/0328r0 (Discussion on Threshold-based Sensing)

Hi All,

Thank you all for the comments and the discussions on the contribution 11-22/0328r0 (Discussion on Threshold-based Sensing).

Per the comments to the SP I presented at the end of the contribution, I modified the SP text as below. Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions.

Do you agree that TGbf should define the “CSI variation” based on a reference metric in the threshold-based measurement and reporting procedure?

Note: The reference metric defines what the CSI variation computation is based upon

Best regards,

Ray

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] SP text for 11-22/0328r0 (Discussion on Threshold-based Sensing)