Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
I don’t think we can make the ‘reference metric normative’ as it could require performance testing, which is hardly done. It can be an informative text perhaps as an appendix, if it contains much details. From: Claudio Da Silva <000015f3cbee3aeb-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. Thanks, Rui. Two comments:
Thanks, Claudio From: Rui Yang <Rui.Yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi All, Thank you all for the comments and the discussions on the contribution 11-22/0328r0 (Discussion on Threshold-based Sensing).
Per the comments to the SP I presented at the end of the contribution, I modified the SP text as below. Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions.
Do you agree that TGbf should define the “CSI variation” based on a reference metric in the threshold-based
measurement and reporting procedure? Note: The reference metric defines what the CSI variation computation is based upon
Best regards, Ray To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1 |