Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Sounds perfect to me unless Claudio has a different input. From: Junghoon Suh <000017d35818e7c0-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. Hi, Ali I thought “(i.e. AP)” looked a little unprofessional, and the similar sentence repeats in the Clause 11, so I Rejected earlier. However, how about changing it to “Revised” as following below? In a non-TB sensing measurement instance (see 11.55.1.5.3 (Non-TB sensing measurement instance)), there is always only one intended recipient STA and the RA field is set to the address of that STA,
which is the AP. Let me know how you think. Regards Junghoon From: Ali Raissinia [mailto:alirezar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hi Junghoon, I am thinking the resolution would also need to be accept since the RA address is indeed AP’s MAC address for NTB, no? From: Junghoon Suh <000017d35818e7c0-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. Hello, Ali Thank you for reviewing my CR in advance. Yes, the CID 1686 has an typo in the Reject reason, and let me update the “TB” to “Non-TB”. As for the 1767, I am fine with your suggestion, and let me prepare the Rev 1 based on your feedback. Let us wait and see during the presentation in the TGbf call if
there will be any further comments before I upload the Rev 1 to the server. Thank you Regards Junghoon From: Ali Raissinia [mailto:alirezar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hi Junghoon, thanks for resolving these CIDs. Regarding CID 1686, the text is associated with NTB hence the suggested minor edit, see below
Also regarding this CID
I am fine if we want to change it to ‘four’ variant but since we don’t have the concept of sub-variant I took the initiative to make minor edits-see below (feel free to accept or reject as you see
fit) TGbf editor: please modify the senstence between P29L20 and P29L25 in D1.1 as follows
The From: Junghoon Suh <000017d35818e7c0-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. Hello, Tony Could you please put the following CR to the Agenda list? 23/1035r0 CR for LB272 NDPA Instance TTT Part 2 (Junghoon
Suh, Huawei) I prefer to present this CR documentation in the TGbf conference call on 29 June 2023. Thank you Regards Junghoon From: Hanxiao (Tony, WT Lab) [mailto:0000177ab8f731c4-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Dear all, This is a reminder and
call for submissions for the upcoming
meeting
on:
Please note:
•
DCN, Title, Author (affiliation), Time duration
Best Regards : ) Tony Xiao
Han To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1 |