| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
If I understand option 2 correctly, the Measurement Session Indication field will continue to be used as an octet in which 3 bits of it would be
Measurement Session ID field. If that is the case, then I also like option 2. From: Rojan Chitrakar <00002005fb56ded7-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. Hi Atsushi, Thanks for resolving these. For CID 3068, 3 bits are used for Measurement Session ID in Sensing NDPA, Sounding Trigger frame etc., so
option 2 seems to be the right option for me. Best Regards, Rojan Chitrakar From:
stds-802-11-tgbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <stds-802-11-tgbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of SHIRAKAWA Atsushi Hi All I presented 23/1477r0 in last Interim session and got advice that the Resolution Column should be modified according to Comment Resolution Guidance. I modified it as 23/1474r1 attached and moved sensitive CID3068 to another document 23/1657r0.
I understood CID3068 is a sensitive issue and listen to a more broader opinion. Please go through 23/1657 and comment back. BR. Atsushi. To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1 |