Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Okan, Here attached are the “corrected” figures for Device ID and the joint IRM/Device ID.
The IRM figures are correct and I have not touched them. These figures now comply with the device ID/PASN ID proposal as per 24/0789r7. (I have sent edits on this document to Li Yan)
All that remains is make the text agree with the figures :>) Hopefully that should not be difficult. I was confused by the last figure as it jumped form 4w HS to PASN and back. I simply made it a combined 4w HS example. I don’t think we need to mix PASN as well. If doing PASN, and using IRM I can’t think of any possible reason why a
STA would also try to use PASN ID. Thanks Graham From: Okan Mutgan (Nokia) <okan.mutgan@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi all, As we discussed in the call today, to move forward, Graham volunteered to modify the example figures and text (thanks a lot Graham) for this
submission. Thanks! BR, Okan To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1 |
Attachment:
Example Device ID and IRM figures.vsdx
Description: Example Device ID and IRM figures.vsdx