| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Graham, Mark, all,
For the resolution on the following CIDs, some member remind me we need do the same change in other places as well,like subelement and KDE for both Device ID and IRM. Because the status field of the subelement and KDE refer to the status field of the element defined in subclause 9.4..2.X
3016 | Smith, Graham | 27/32 | As the Device ID Status filed is omitted when sent from non-AP STA to AP, the Octets should be "0 or 1". | At 27.33 under "Device ID Status" change "1" to "0 or 1" | Accepted-- |
3122 | DeLaOlivaDelgado, Antonio | 28 /16 | The IRM status length is 0 or 1, for coherence we should have the same as in the status of device ID, which is always present but reserved in one direction. | Either change device ID Status length to 0 or 1 (and say it is not present) or change IRM status to 1 and indicate it is reserved. | Revised-- At 27.33 under "Device ID Status" change "1" to "0 or 1" |
The proposed NEW resolution for both CIDs:
1) At 27.33,29.52, 40.28, under "Device ID Status" change "1" to "0 or 1"
2) At 30.4, 40.46 under "IRM Status" change "1" to "0 or 1"
Welcome more thought on this.
Thanks
Best Regards
Jay Yang (杨志杰)
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1