Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[STDS-802-11-TGBH] a minor technical issue in PASN ID contribution



Hi Graham and other members,

    I'v uploaded 789r8 based on the discussion of the last meeting. Basically most are related to the editorial changes and to keep consistent with CR for CID 3122 about the length of device ID status(0 or 1).

    The only technical issue is as following(i.e., use 'may' or 'shall' ):

Basically i'm not sure which one should be used, so in the previous revision i just used the word 'may'(my intention is that we can have more discussion if anyone has different idea about this). However, Graham points out it should be 'shall'  and i totally agree with it.


I also want to see if other members have different opinion on this.

Additionally, cloud you please check the new revision to see if it's good for you, Graham ?🙂




Best Regards!

李炎 Li Yan

标准预研工程师   Standard Development Engineer
架构团队/有线规划部/有线产品经营部 Architecture Team/Wireline Product Planning Dept/Wireline Product Operation



南京市雨花台区软件大道50号中兴通讯

ZTE Corporation,50 Software Avenue, Yuhuatai District, 

Nanjing, P.R.China, 210012 

T: +86 755 xxxxxxxx F:+86 15850568971
M: +86 xxxxxxxxxxx
E: li.yan16@xxxxxxxxxx

www.zte.com.cn




To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1