| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Jonathon/Roy, I would like to withdraw comment I-74, from the TGbk Initial SA ballot. Upon deeper review of REVme, including the roll-in of 802.11az, I can see that the same language as is being proposed in TGbk is already there is many of the “earlier” PHY clauses. I still am confused by this language, but it seems that it would be better if I took this concern to REVmf, where it could be properly considered across the entire 802.11 Draft (in all the PHY clauses). Hence, I think it is fine/proper for TGbk to proceed with the language, as exists in D3.0, and I withdraw my comment. Thanks! Mark To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBK list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBK&A=1 |