Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[STDS-802-11-TGBN] 答复: SPs on AP PS and Roaming



Hi,

 

I would like encourage the people provide more inputs to convince us why using the same PTK can improve the roaming performance especially when the non-AP MLD can negotiate a new PTKSA with the one or more target AP MLDs over-the DS in advance by using the FT mechanism.

 

For the roaming AP MLD, we also want to the people who insists on the roaming AP MLD with the same PTK provide more input to explain why the PTK can be shared among AP MLDs. If the PTK can be shared among AP MLDs, it is equivalent to say the current FT key architecture developed by 11r is not useful at all. Compared with the network architecture considered by 11r, what’s the new change which allows the PTK can be shared?

 

Another point of view I can provide is: if the PTK can be shared, it means the current PTK derivation bounded with the itself MAC address doesn’t make any sense.

 

Hope we can make some progress. Thanks!

 

 

Regards

Guogang Huang

发件人: huangguogang [mailto:000017b1384624cd-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2024515 19:17
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] SPs on AP PS and Roaming

 

Hi Alfred,

 

I’d like to queue the following SPs for the AP PS and Roaming in the MAC queue

 

 

SP1. Do you support to define a mechanism that allows an AP affiliated with an AP MLD to be in the PS mode?

Note: The reference document is 24-0352r1

 

SP 2. Do you support to define a mechanism that allows the non-AP MLD to send a wakeup request through an enabled link on which the affiliated AP is operating in awake state to wake up another AP which is affiliated with the same AP MLD and operating in the doze state of the PS mode?

Note: The reference document is 24-0352r1

 

 

SP 3. Do you support to improve the current fast BSS transition protocol in 11bn?

      Note: Some harmonization based on [24/0349r3, 24/0679r0]

 

SP 4. Do you support to define in 11bn that a non-AP MLD probes the target AP MLD over the DS via the current AP MLD?

      Note: Some harmonization based on [24/0349r3, 24/0679r0]

 

 

Regards

Guogang Huang


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1