Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Ron,

Attached please find my comments and some small inline edits.

Best,

Ying

From: Dana.Ciochina@xxxxxxxx <Dana.Ciochina@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 11:42 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Hi Ron,

Please find attached some small comments from my side also.

Best regards,

Dana

From: Shimi Shilo (TRC) <000018c72fccabed-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 12:31 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Hi Ron, Thanks for your efforts and for sharing the updated version. I’m attaching the PDT with some suggested changes (mostly phrasing-related). I also included two comments/questions. Best regards, Shimi From: Ron Porat <000009a0da80e877-dmarc-request@ listserv. ieee. org>

Hi Ron,

Thanks for your efforts and for sharing the updated version.

I’m attaching the PDT with some suggested changes (mostly phrasing-related). I also included two comments/questions.

Best regards,

Shimi

From: Ron Porat <000009a0da80e877-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2024 10:47 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Hi Insik,

Thank you , will update in r2.

On GI+LTF – we wanted to keep signaling at 1bit and avoid the option that is not used in EHT (4x LTF). Agree it should be SP.

Regards,

Ron

From: Insik Jung/IoT Connectivity Standard TP <insik0618.jung@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 9:52 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Hi Ron,

Thank you for your efforts. I'd like to attach my comments.

Best regards,

Insik Jung

LG ELECTRONICS

보낸 사람: Qinglai Liu <qinglai.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
보낸 날짜: 2024년 12월 13일 금요일 오후 12:17
받는 사람: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
제목: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Hi Ron,

Thanks for addressing all the comments. I have an editorial comment regarding r1.

In 38.3.20.4, “COBF transmissions are defined only for a UHR AP that can transmit at least 4 or more spatial streams.”

I think “at least” should be removed.

Best Regards,

Qinglai

Panasonic

From: Ron Porat <000009a0da80e877-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2024 3:44 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Hi Wook bong, Qinglai, Leonardo, Xiaogang, Jay, All,

Thank you for all the good comments received so far. I reviewed all of them and addressed what I thought should be fixed based also on further discussions with some of the other contributors. Uploaded r1 for your review.

One comment – section 38.3.20.1 contains non-normative text, prefer to keep it simple and not go into a tutorial of this topic’s theory.

Regards,

Ron

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1