Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-MAC P-EDCA

Hi Dmitry, 

I agree with Mohamed. The PDT should reflect the motion text. The motion text reads "has to be balanced", and "has to" is better reflected with 'shall', but I can live with 'should'.

Regards,
Minyoung

On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 8:16 AM Mohamed Abouelseoud <mohamed.a.abouelseoud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
@Mark, there should be some rules, TBD (for example on who and how often to use the P-EDCA and for how long), to recommend implementation requirements to limit the effect on the legacy.   Maybe we can keep should and add "through TBD rules"

On Dec 19, 2024, at 7:59 AM, Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"should" is used to introduce a recommendation on implementations.
Exactly what recommendation are you proposing here, Mohamed?
 
I have the following comments on r1:
 
- "EDCA channel access protocol" -- the CA in EDCA is channel access,
so we have enhanced distributed channel access channel access protocol.
And I'm not sure it's a protocol anyway ("channel access protocol" and
"EDCA protocol" do not appear in me/D7.0).  What was wrong with
"EDCA mechanism" (which appears more than 20 times in me/D7.0)?
 
- "worst case" should be "worst-case"
 
- "reduces worst case access delay" is missing "the"
 
- "an UHR" should be "a UHR"
 
Thanks,
 
Mark
 
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN   English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre       Tel: +44 1223  434600
1 Cambridge Square, Cambridge CB4 0AE   Fax: +44 1223  434601
ROYAUME UNI                             WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk
 
From: Mohamed Abouelseoud <mohamed.a.abouelseoud@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 19 December 2024 15:43
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-MAC P-EDCA
 
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for working on the PDT and for the update. 
I think that the sentence about the effect on legacy approved in the motion is better than the one currently updated. I am not sure what is expected to means., “Should" is the common word we use for expected behavior. Also, I would keep it with the description text not move it to an editor note!
Thanks,
Mohamed
 


On Dec 17, 2024, at 5:37 PM, Akhmetov, Dmitry <Dmitry.Akhmetov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 
Greetings all,
 
Thank you for submitted comments.
 
Revision 1 is now on mentor:
 
 
Please use this thread to provide additional comments/suggestion you may have.
 
Thank you,
Dmitry
 
 
From: Akhmetov, Dmitry
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 10:07 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: PDT-MAC P-EDCA
 
Greetings everyone,
 
This is the thread to start discussion on the Prioritized EDCA , P-EDCA (formerly known as HiP EDCA) .
The initial version of the proposed draft text document can be found here:
 
 
Dmitry 
 
 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1