| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi, Please find below answers to the questions I captured from the chat of Webex regarding document 2007r5: Binita Gupta : "A P-EDCA eligible STA may start a P-EDCA contention to deliver buffered traffic" —> "A P-EDCA eligible STA may start a P-EDCA contention to deliver buffered traffic if the TBD conditions are met". Need to include
reference to conditions in this 'may requirement' Patrice NEZOU: Agree with Binita. P-EDCA eligible STA shall have LL traffics to deliver in AC_VO
Answer: If I got the comment correctly, it is about sentence on p3L34. In fact, the following lines (36-40) completely cover that: To start P-EDCA contention the P-EDCA eligible STA shall transmit [#339] CTS frame if the following conditions are satisfied:
Gaius Wee: “ p4L28. "did not to receive CTS frame". Should delete "to" Answer: Ack, corrected Liwen Chu, Mohamed Abouelseoud this (setting to AP's MAC address) is not optimized solution. Answer: Ok , we can definitely discuss this further. Leaving “RA field set to MAC address of an AP…” TBD for now. Binita Gupta "A P-EDCA eligible STA that did not initiate a TXOP (see
10.23.2.4) using P-EDCA contention or did not to receive CTS frame in response to the RTS frame used to initiate the TXOP obtained using P-EDCA contention may transmit CTS frame without invoking backoff procedure as in
10.23.2.4 to start another P-EDCA contention, for up to TBD retries."
On this part there is no motion, so need more discussion Answer: this is motioned as a part of the motion 272 Xiangxin Gu Why AIFSN[2] is needed in P-EDCA contention? It's in protected duration. Answer : The value of AIFSN[AC] shall be greater than or equal to 2 for non-AP STAs To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |