Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] LB291 - CR for 9.4.2.355 MAPC element

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Thanks Arik for preparing the doc. More comments from me follows…

7799/7800/7801/7802:

Why are we calling out the description of the fields twice; once for the MAPC Discovery Req/Resp and another for MAPC Negotiation Req/Resp?
Also why did you redefine the encoding of the fields? That is not needed and will require defining the maximum that you are subtracting from.

7803/67804:

Can you please clarify the intention of that change? I am not clear on the changes proposed.

Regards,

Sherief

From: Giovanni Chisci <00002b657bbbbed7-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2026 2:08 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] LB291 - CR for 9.4.2.355 MAPC element

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

Thanks for the document Arik.

Some comments here:

7798: keep the definitions e.g. ‘Co-RTWT profile’ in 3.2 as well (add missing ones in 3.2).

10474: I the sentence is removed, where is it clarified that only one profile per scheme can be added?

7791: not convinced that this is a wording improvement, I would refrain from changing in this way.

Best,

Giovanni

From: Arik Klein <0000177967a59511-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 3:09 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] LB291 - CR for 9.4.2.355 MAPC element

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

Hi all / MAPC TTTs

I’ve uploaded 11-26/0410r0 (29 CIDs) on the mentor.

Your review and comments are highly appreciated.

Regards,

Arik

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1