Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Please see below… This relates to CID 2401 reviewed yesterday. Michelle does not support my position. So, I shall do a volte face. We should, IMHO, resolve this comment by changing the heading, as “recommended practice” has a special meaning in IEEE-SA parlance. We might consider replacing “it is recommended that” with “should” and use the active voice, e.g. “It is recommended that pigs fly” becomes “Pigs should fly”. Best Regards, Adrian P STEPHENS Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office) Tel: +1 (408) 2397485 (mobile, USA) ---------------------------------------------- From: Michelle Turner [mailto:m.d.turner@xxxxxxxx]
Hi Adrian It's fine to have "should" in an informative annex. I would, however, not use the words "Recommended Practice" in the heading as that is a document type. Rather, I recommend
(ha!) something like, "Recommendation for implementation of..." We can discuss more next week. See you in Beijing :-) On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Stephens, Adrian P <Adrian.P.Stephens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-- Michelle Turner IEEE Standards Association IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand. SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button. Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ |