| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
| --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
I have the following comments on 14/1353r2: Do we restrict the allocation of existing Element IDs?[mgr'1]
First come / first served[mgr'2]
Use for basic rate frames only?[mgr'3] The frame body components specified for many management subtypes result in elements ordered by
ascending values of the Element ID field and Element ID Extension field (when present)[mgr'8] ,
with the exception of the MIC Management element (8.4.2.57 (Management MIC element)). If present, the MIC Management element appears at the end of the robust management frame body. See 9.24.6 (Element parsing) on the parsing of elements. Mark --
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk From: *** IEEE stds-802-11
List *** [mailto:STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephens, Adrian P --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---
Dear 802.11 members, TGmc considered a proposal to extend the Element ID space. The proposal as updated during the meeting is captured in document:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-1353-02-000m-proposal-to-extend-element-id-space.doc. This proposal will be brought to motion during a TGmc meeting today (thursday). Sending to the larger reflector because of the interdependency with the WG discussion on use of the Element ID space. The impact of the TGmc proposal is that it will consume a small number of Element IDs (3).
Best Regards, Adrian P STEPHENS Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office) Tel: +1 (408) 2397485 (mobile, USA) ---------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________________________________________
If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.
Instead, go to
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11 and then press the LEAVE button.
If there is no LEAVE button here, try
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-RO. Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
[mgr'1]Yes. For example, things which need to be requestable using a
Request element should be [mgr'2]No [mgr'3]What is the rationale? [mgr'4]So this row is not, in fact, changing for now, right? (Document
shows zero-sum changes) [mgr'6]+”field”? [mgr'7]You’re requesting three assignments, no? [mgr'8]What does this mean? What is the precedence? I think you need
to say ascending EID and then for an EID using an EIDE, by ascending EIDE IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand. SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button. Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ |