Hello Mark,
Thanks. This resolves my issue. I agree it’s worded badly, but the intent is clear.
Best Regards,
Adrian P STEPHENS
Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office)
Tel: +1 (971) 330 6025 (mobile) ç please note new number
----------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47
From: Mark Rison [mailto:m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 2:50 AM
To: Stephens, Adrian P; STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Parsing the RSNE in 802.11
Hello Adrian,
With every field optional, and no field to indicate which fields are present how is this parsed?
For example, Do you rely on a Group Data Cipher Suite that starts with octets that couldn’t reasonably be
a Pairwise Cipher Suite count value?
How do you tell the difference between an absent Pairwise Cipher Suite Count and an AKM Suite Count?
See 817.57: "All fields after the Version field are optional. If any
nonzero length field is absent, then none of the subsequent fields is
included."
(The "nonzero length field" thing is a bit confusing, but it's about
the fact that if e.g. the AKM Suite Count is 0 then the length of
the AKM Suite List field is 0.)
See also CID 6332.
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk
From: ***** IEEE stds-802-11-tgm
List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Stephens, Adrian P
Sent: 17 June 2015 10:37
To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Parsing the RSNE in 802.11
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Dear TGmc folks,
Can you help me with this? Here is the RSNE:
With every field optional, and no field to indicate which fields are present how is this parsed?
For example, Do you rely on a Group Data Cipher Suite that starts with octets that couldn’t reasonably be
a Pairwise Cipher Suite count value?
How do you tell the difference between an absent Pairwise Cipher Suite Count and an AKM Suite Count?
Best Regards,
Adrian P STEPHENS
Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office)
Tel: +1 (971) 330 6025 (mobile) ç please note new number
----------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47
_______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.
SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to -
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.
SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________