| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
| --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hi, Emily. I disagree with your rejection of CID 1502. This is an unusual construction, but we have a (single) field called “FMS Counters”, which is itself made up of zero or more FMS Counter fields, per the text (there is no figure showing this). The “Number of FMS Counters” field contains the number of these (zero or more) “FMS Counter” fields that are within the “FMS Counters” field. So, the commenter is correct that the text at P1143.37 should say “the number of FMS Counter fields”. It could perhaps be improved by saying “the number of FMS Counter fields that are contained in the FMS Counters field in the FMS Descriptor element” to avoid others tripping over this same oddity. Mark From: ***** 802.11 REVm - Revision Maintainance List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Qi, Emily H --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector --- Hello Dorothy and all, I have uploaded the following document with proposed comment resolutions for the EDITOR ad hoc: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/18/11-18-0657-00-000m-revmd-wg-lb232-comments-for-editor-ad-hoc.xls. 72 editorial comments are addressed in the tab “Review”. Please review and let me know if you have any question. I plan to have a motion to approve those comment resolutions (72 “easy” editorial comments) in the May IEEE meeting if there is no further question. Regards, Emily Qi To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1 |