Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
2601 | 19 | Re CID 1468: need to be clearer that the ED thresholds are based on declaring busy *if* a PPDU of a given type with energy above a certain threshold is present, not based on detecting a PPDU of a given type and *then* checking the energy is above the corresponding threshold | As it says in the comment | In the table in 6.5.4.3 When
generated (in the aCCATime row), in 17.3.10.6 CCA requirements, in 18.4.6 CCA
performance, in 19.3.19.5.4 CCA sensitivity in 20 MHz, in 19.3.19.5.5 CCA
sensitivity in 40 MHz (2x), in 20.4.4.2.2 CCA, in 20.5.4.2.2 CCA, in 24.4.4.2.2
CCA, in 24.5.4.2.2 CCA, 25.4.6.2.2 CCA, 25.5.7.2.2 CCA, 25.6.9.3.2 CCA: change “a valid” to “a” or
“an”, as appropriate for the starting sound of the following word. |
----------------------
Dorothy Stanley
IEEE 802.11 WG Chair, dstanley@xxxxxxxx
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
dorothy.stanley@xxxxxxx
dstanley1389@xxxxxxxxx
+1 630-363-1389
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1