| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
| CID | Page | Clause | Duplicate of CID | Resn Status | Comment | Proposed Change |
| 4222 | 3524.00 | 25.5.7.1.3 | "106" should be "10<sup>6</sup>", and the size of "440x10<sup>6</sup>" on the previous line should be made consistent with surrounding text | As it says in the comment | ||
| 4223 | 3544.00 | 25.6.9.2.3 | "1320" is off by 6 orders of magnitude | Add " <mult> 10<sup>6</sup>" after the cited text. Also fix the size of "660x10<sup>6</sup>" on the same line to be consistent with surrounding text | ||
| 4225 | 3566.00 | 25.15.3 | "540 " should be "540 MHz" | As it says in the comment | ||
| 4235 | 3528.00 | 25.6.5.5 | "transmitted using duplication style" -- not defined | Change to "duplicated" | ||
| 4237 | 3513.00 | 25.5.1 | " transmitted by CMMG SC MIMO" -- huh? | Change to " with MIMO" | ||
| 4559 | 3545.00 | 25.7.2.3 | "A value of N in the
Training Length field indicates that the AGC has 4N subfields and that the
TRN- R/T field has 5N subfields." but 20.9.2.2.3 (referred to from Table 25-7--Fields in the CMMG SIG field) says "A value of N in the Training Length field indicates 4xN AGC subfields and that the TRN-R/T field has N TRN Units." so there is duplication and possibly also contradiction |
Delete the xref to 20.9.2.2.3 in Table 25-7 | ||
| 4693 | 24 | CID 2036 follow-up, are the 128s in Figures 24-2/5 correct? | As it says in the comment | |||
| 4714 | 3504.00 | 25.3.9.1 | Table 25-7---Fields in the CMMG SIG field needs the same changes as made under CID 1351. However Assaf reports that it "requires (a lot of) more work because the scrambling is not mentioned in the encoding process." | Ask Assaf to kindly to the more work |
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1