[STDS-802-11-TGM] CID 4096 discussion

[Stephen McCann <mccann.stephen@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---

Dear all,

           during the TGmd teleconference on June 12th, we discussed the following CID:

CID	Clause Number(C)	Page(C)	Line(C)	Comment	Proposed Change
4096	11.23.3.4	2432	57	What is a "protected Action frame"? Should this be a "Protected Dual of Public Action frame"? If that is true, then isn't the decision about whether RLQP is protected or not up to the regulatory domain, as opposed to the protocol (i.e. RLQP) itself?	Change the sentence "When RLQP is transmitted between the GDD dependent STA and its GDD enabling STA, it uses protected Action frames, but does not use Ethertype 89-0d frames"to"When RLQP is transmitted between the GDD dependent STA and its GDD enabling STA, it does not use Ethertype 89-0d frames. In some regulatory domains, RLQP may use Protected Dual of Public Action frames"

and I received some feedback on better wording of the proposed change, which is now:

"When RLQP is transmitted between the GDD dependent STA and its GDD enabling STA, it does not use Ethertype 89-0d frames and in some regulatory domains might use Protected Dual of Public Action frames."

and the next sentence (2432.60) is:

"In some regulatory domains, the GDD enabling STA might be required to have a secured connection with the RLSS.”

Any comments or discussion about this please? Thanks.

Kind regards

Stephen

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1