| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
CID |
Page |
Clause |
Comment |
Proposed Change |
|
164 |
“shall be capable of” is not clear. It might allow a device to be capable of doing something, but not actually do it |
Change to “shall” in each case. Ditto “shall be able to” |
AdHoc Notes:
GEN: 2021-10-01
15:33:36Z – status set to: Submission Required
GEN: 2021-05-12 22:27:19Z – status set to: Submission Required
Discussion:
28 Instances of “shall be capable of”
The first instance at P1745.5 “A STA shall be capable of receiving MPDUs, containing all or part of an MSDU, of arbitrary length that is less than or equal to the maximum MSDU size as defined in 9.2.4.7 (Frame Body field), plus any security encapsulation overhead, plus MAC header and FCS.
Changing as requested:
A STA shall receive MPDUs, containing all or part of an MSDU, of arbitrary length that is less than or equal to the maximum MSDU size as defined in 9.2.4.7 (Frame Body field), plus any security encapsulation overhead, plus MAC header and FCS.
Does not read correctly.
This is similar to the other 27 instances.
Proposed Resolution:
Reject: The change of “shall be capable of” to “shall” does not provide a complete sentence. While making a more extensive change to the sentence to some other form may be done, the sentence is not wrong or ambiguous.
Input?
Jon
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1