[STDS-802-11-TGM] CID 2315 re-consideration - was [Pull requests for today's motions]

[Stephen McCann <mccann.stephen@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---

Mark,

         thanks for your work on this CID 2315:

 

CID 2315 in MAC-AL: I don't think this is correct.  I think the point of "ESA" (albeit perhaps not clear) is that if you have Planned ESS set then you know there are no "dead spots" within the area covered by the ESS (i.e. topologically there are no holes).  Maybe the wording should be closer to "This subfield is set to 1 to indicate that the ESS is deployed to ensure that there is coverage over the entire area bounded by the convex hull of the BSAs of the BSSes in the ESS"

I think your revised wording is ok, but I would prefer not to introduce "convex hull" as a new topological term into the specification.  I think alternative wording could be "This subfield is set to 1 to indicate that the ESS is deployed to ensure that there is coverage over the entire area bounded by the BSAs of the BSSes in the ESS".

Do you have any further comments? Thanks

Kind regards

Stephen

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1