| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Mark,Abhi's documents are on r2 of the agenda.We ran a motion to approve Brian's contribution in November.I have not received any other requests for agenda time, but we have time available.Cheers,MikeOn Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 3:43 PM <mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi, Mike,
If you are still trying to fill time on the REVmf agenda, here are some suggestions:
- I see these posted, but not (yet) on your agenda deck (I’m sure you’re still synching up):
- 11-24/1908r2 :REVme SB1 CID6081 do over – Hart
- 11-25/0132r0: MLO extensions to 11s mesh – Patil
- 11-25/0133r0: EBCS UL transmission – Patil
- The proponents of L4S support over 802.11 wanted to bring some materials (or maybe just discussion) to REVmf, if they are ready (in parallel with some discussions in TGbn) – White, Hervieu
- I would like to bring a discussion (and can have a presentation for Wednesday, if it is appropriate and there is time) on the existing text description of the behavior for when TIME_OF_DEPARTURE_REQUESTED is false. I had put a comment into TGbk on this, which I then pulled when I realized that TGbk’s text matched a bunch of existing baseline text – all of which I think is poorly written (it leaves things very vague/unstated for this case). I think it’s a trivial fix, but only if the group agrees with the direction. I can also wait an put in a comment on our D1.0, if you’d rather.
Mark
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1