--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Mike, Per our off-line discussion, if there is nothing else for the Wed meeting slot, I will defer my TIME_OF_DEPARTURE_REQUESTED topic to the next opportunity (telecon/session). Thanks! Mark From: Greg White <g.white@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, 12 January, 2025 17:46
To: mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx; STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'M Montemurro' <montemurro.michael@xxxxxxxxx>; Lili Hervieu <L.Hervieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: (Possible) agenda items for REVmf Thanks Mark for mentioning the L4S support topic. For this meeting we don’t intend to have a discussion in REVmf on this topic. -Greg Hi, Mike, If you are still trying to fill time on the REVmf agenda, here are some suggestions: - I see these posted, but not (yet) on your agenda deck (I’m sure you’re still synching up):
- 11-24/1908r2 :REVme SB1 CID6081 do over – Hart
- 11-25/0132r0: MLO extensions to 11s mesh – Patil
- 11-25/0133r0: EBCS UL transmission – Patil
- The proponents of L4S support over 802.11 wanted to bring some materials (or maybe just discussion) to REVmf, if they are ready (in parallel with some discussions in TGbn) – White, Hervieu
- I would like to bring a discussion (and can have a presentation for Wednesday, if it is appropriate and there is time) on the existing text description of the behavior for when TIME_OF_DEPARTURE_REQUESTED is false. I had put a comment into TGbk on this, which I then pulled when I realized that TGbk’s text matched a bunch of existing baseline text – all of which I think is poorly written (it leaves things very vague/unstated for this case). I think it’s a trivial fix, but only if the group agrees with the direction. I can also wait an put in a comment on our D1.0, if you’d rather.
Mark
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1 |