Re: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Revision 2 of the proposed resolutions for 74 comm

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---

Hi, Edward,

Thank you very much for this.

Resolution for CID 7 results in, for example,

27.3.12.15 Dual carrier modulation

...

DCM is an optional modulation scheme for the HE-SIG-B and Data fields.

...

DCM is an optional modulation scheme for the HE-SIG-B and Data fields.

Could you please pull CID 7 out and assign to me? I will think more about how to resolve this CID.

Also, I would like to review CID 257 a bit more.

Would appreciate re-assigning it to me as well.

Regards,

Youhan

From: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 2:02 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Revision 2 of the proposed resolutions for 74 comments posted

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---

Dear all,

Thanks Mark for his further offline comments and Jouni for his comments that I've addressed all of them in revision 2:

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/25/11-25-1612-02-000m-proposed-resolution-for-revmf-lb289-comments.xlsx

Changes are highlighted in green.

Regards,

Edward

On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 11:23 AM Jouni Malinen <jkmalinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

CID 508: Strictly speaking, we do not have an MLME-DISASSOCIATE or MLME-DEAUTHENTICATE primitive. This "transition or receives or invokes an MLME Disassociation or Deauthentication primitive" should be changed to "transition, receives an MLME-DISASSOCIATE.indication or MLME-DEAUTHENTICATE.indication primitive, or invokes an MLME-DISASSOCIATE.request or MLME-DEAUTHENTICATE.request primitive". This type of construction is already used for the AP's SME just below this location (P3336 L49-50). In addition, the order of DISASSOCIATE and DEAUTHENTICATE for this non-AP STA case could be swapped here to be consistent with the AP case below.

- Jouni

On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 8:55 AM Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---

Dear Mark,

Thank you very much for your comments.

I've addressed the majority of them. Please refer to revision 1 of the material as follows:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/25/11-25-1612-01-000m-proposed-resolution-for-revmf-lb289-comments.xlsx

Of note is that while I do not address your remaining comment "More generally I suggest examining the ~35 instances of "to a value of" and deleting "a value of" where it's just waffle. The ones that go "to a value of its choosing" are OK, the ones in TXVECTORs need to be "to the value of". We can work offline to check the texts and see how these can be improved (as a separate contribution).

Regards,
Edward

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Revision 2 of the proposed resolutions for 74 comments posted