Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---
Hi Jon,
On 9/18/14 1:01 AM, "Jon Rosdahl" <jrosdahl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, this is the confusion I am trying to fix. I think we should follow a consistent
convention in this regard.
There is no hash algorithm called "SHA128". There are 3 families of SHA:
-- family 1: SHA1
-- family 2: SHA224, SHA256, SHA384, and SHA512.
-- family 3: SHA3
These are the only names that we should be using.
That is correct. If you want 128 bits and you want to use SHA256 then you
would say SHA256-128.
When getting rid of keys the implication is that they are irretrievably discarded.
When getting rid of finite state machines the implication is they are just freed up,
and returned to the pool of finite state machines to use when you need another.
For "state concerning the TSID/direction with in the MAC" (section 6.3.26.7.2)
I have no idea!
regards,
Dan.
_______________________________________________________________________________ If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect. Instead, go to http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11 and then press the LEAVE button. If there is no LEAVE button here, try http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-RO. Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ |