| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
| --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---
All, FYI – my “No” vote on this topic (which may or may not represent others) was driven by a concern that I believe there is a mixture of OOK (generically) and MC-OOK, in the relevant 11ba text. It is very hard to tell if MC-OOK truly is just an “example” of one way OOK could be done (and still be compliant to the Standard). There are statements that this is the case (MC-OOK is just one way to do it). But, there are other places where sentences seem to say (on a careful read) that MC-OOK is actually required. I am assuming that the former (MC-OOK is just one way to do it) is the intention, and we should “clean up” other places (maybe including the definition, maybe adding a definition of OOK?) to be consistent with this. I’d be very curious if the 11ba experts agree with my general assumption, above. (I volunteered to help Joe with his resolution, so would like to head in the right direction.) Thanks. Mark From: M Montemurro <montemurro.michael@xxxxxxxxx> --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector --- Hello everyone, During motions in REVme today, the resolution to approve the resolution to CID 2346 (see below) failed. The CID requests a definition for MC-OOK to be removed. I think it would be good to get feedback from those who participated in 11ba so that any changes made are aligned with the text rolled in from P802.11ba-2021. This CID has been assigned to Joseph Levy. Please provide feedback on this thread so that we can reach consensus on a resolution. Thanks,
REVme CC36 Comments
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1 |