Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---
HI, Ben, Interesting points. And, I (somewhat) agree with you. But, the devil here is that the problem is in the details of where and how the word is being used. For example, in the sentence that Xiaofei is modifying, is (in effect) the definition of “HE STA”, so it’s really trying to say “An HE STA is the thingy that supports (that is, the implementation has the capability _and the capability is enabled in the current instantiation_) all the mandatory features, and some subset (including all, or none) of the optional features, of HE.” (And, we would same for any other significant feature set, replacing “HE” with “VHT”, “HT”, “QoS”, etc..) Mark From: Benjamin Rolfe <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector --- The word "support" and "supports" is used at least 4365 times in 802.11-2020. It means that a conforming implementation has the capability. If you redefine it to mean an optional feature then you change the meaning of each of those 4365 uses of "support", "supported", "supports", etc. This is IMO a very bad idea. If the intention is that the feature or set of features described is optional functionality, then "may support" is the correct phrase. You may be tempted to use "may optionally" or "optionally supports" but neither is correct: "may" defines an optional requirement (so "optionally" is redundant). "optionally supports" is not actually stating a normative requirement (thus it is not clear what is intended). I have no opinion on whether support for the indicated functions should be mandatory or optional, only a preference that the group decide which and specify it correctly. The correct choices are "shall support" or "may support" according the group's intentions. FWIW correct use of language and clear specification is important 😉 Regards Ben Benjamin A. Rolfe Blind Creek Associates +1 408 332 0725 (Mobile) +1 408 395 7207 (Office) From: Xiaofei Wang <00001995ce968e76-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector --- Dear all, For RevME, there is a comment 7024 for 26.1 regarding the word “supports”. The proposed CR is to change Subclause 26.1 as follows (as shown below and in 11-24/718r1). It is mostly editorial changes. Please let me know if you have any comments/changes. There are also a number other sentences that may need to be changed regarding the word “supports”. 26. High-efficiency (HE) MAC specification(11ax) 26.1 Introduction An HE STA supports the mandatory MAC and MLME functions and may support the optional MAC and MLME functions:
A frame successfully transmitted by a non-AP STA in response to a Basic Trigger frame is a successful frame exchange sequence(#109) initiated by the STA as referred to in Clause 11 (MLME) and Clause 12 (Security).
Xiaofei Clement Wang Principal Engineer | InterDigital T: (631) 622.4028 E: Xiaofei.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1 |