RE: stds-802-16-mobile: Handoff Ad-Hoc, second iteration
Hello All,
I was traveling to France and got the message today.
Thanks to Roger's fast response, Radu's comments are on the server.
I would to thank Radu and ask all of you to provide your feedback.
In order to proceed, please provide any comments/responses/new ideas until
Wednesday 12/02/03.
Next step will be to define a baseline Table of Contents based on agreed
items.
Regards,
Itzik.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-16-mobile@majordomo.ieee.org
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-16-mobile@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
> Roger B. Marks
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 06:39
> To: stds-802-16-mobile@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: stds-802-16-mobile: Handoff Ad-Hoc, second iteration
>
>
> Radu ("Radu Selea" <Radu@redlinecommunications.com>) forgot that
> attachments are forbidden.
>
> I uploaded his file here:
>
> <http://download.mobile.wirelessman.org/Handoff Ad_Issues_Radu.doc>
>
> Roger
>
> >Hi All ,
> >
> >I have put together some comments on "Handoff Ad Issues to Discuss".
> >Itzik ,please disregard the red stripes along the document. I am
> >innocent but the 'spell check' does not like passive voice and it
> >ended like that when I checked my comments.
> >
> >Radu.
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Itzik Kitroser [mailto:itzikk@runcom.co.il]
> >>Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 1:01 PM
> >>To: stds-802-16-mobile@ieee.org
> >>Subject: stds-802-16-mobile: Handoff Ad-Hoc, second iteration
> >>
> >>
> >>Hello all,
> >>I have uploaded two documents to the upload site:
> >>
> >><http://download.mobile.wirelessman.org/Handoff Ad_02.doc>
> >><http://download.mobile.wirelessman.org/Handoff
> Ad_Issues_To_Discuss.doc>
> >>
> >>
> >>I have concentrated all the comments given in the "Handoff Ad_02.doc"
> >>document.
> >>The "Handoff Ad_Issues_To_Discuss.doc" document presents some
> of the issues
> >>that were commented as a response to the “Handoff
> >>Ad_01.doc” document.
> >>I have tried to raise a discussion about the major items in
> "Handoff Ad_01",
> >>but I might have skipped and item.
> >>
> >>Please provide feedback to the open items or items to be decided.
> >>The intention here is to decide on some of the open items.
> >>A specific detailed content about items is also welcome.
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Itzik.