(Re) RE: stds-802-16-mobile: Handoff Ad-Hoc, second iteratio
Hello , Dear Itzik Kitroser and other friends,
We have problems in getting handoff_toc.doc,
my colleagues and I can not access the website http://download.mobile.wirelessman.org.
Is there any special restriction on this website?
I do not know whether other companies have same problems, or just our company network should be checked.
Best Regards.
Yours Zhong Chuan
>Hello all,
>I have uploaded a table of contents (TOC) for the Handoff document.
><http://download.mobile.wirelessman.org/handoff_toc.doc>
>I have tried to consider all the thoughts that where expressed in the
>discussion.
>I hereby call for comments on the submitted Table of Context.
>I also would like to issue a call for contributions to provide a specific
>text to the items provided in the Handoff table of contents.
>The deadline for the comments and contributions is: 28/02/03 (preferably
>contributions and not comments :-))
>The work plan is to receive specific text until the defined deadline, and to
>provide another week for iteration for discussion fine tuning, until
>07/03/03 (extending the original planned deadline).
>I encourage all the interested members to supply your contributions, such
>that we will be able to have an initial draft prior to the IEEE meeting.
>Please try to supply text that is in line with the ideas that have been
>expressed in the discussion until now (at least with ones that seemed to be
>a pseudo-consensus), this will help to the convergence process of the
>suggestions into a draft document.
>Best Regards,
>Itzik Kitroser.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-stds-802-16-mobile@majordomo.ieee.org
>[mailto:owner-stds-802-16-mobile@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf
>Of Itzik Kitroser
>Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:16 AM
>To: stds-802-16-mobile@ieee.org
>Subject: RE: stds-802-16-mobile: Handoff Ad-Hoc, second iteration
>
>
>Hello All,
>
>I was traveling to France and got the message today.
>Thanks to Roger's fast response, Radu's comments are on the server.
>
>I would to thank Radu and ask all of you to provide your feedback.
>
>In order to proceed, please provide any comments/responses/new
>ideas until
>Wednesday 12/02/03.
>
>Next step will be to define a baseline Table of Contents based
>on agreed
>items.
>
>Regards,
>Itzik.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-stds-802-16-mobile@majordomo.ieee.org
>> [mailto:owner-stds-802-16-mobile@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
>> Roger B. Marks
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 06:39
>> To: stds-802-16-mobile@ieee.org
>> Subject: RE: stds-802-16-mobile: Handoff Ad-Hoc, second iteration
>>
>>
>> Radu ("Radu Selea" <Radu@redlinecommunications.com>) forgot that
>> attachments are forbidden.
>>
>> I uploaded his file here:
>>
>> <http://download.mobile.wirelessman.org/Handoff Ad_Issues_Radu.doc>
>>
>> Roger
>>
>> >Hi All ,
>> >
>> >I have put together some comments on "Handoff Ad Issues to Discuss".
>> >Itzik ,please disregard the red stripes along the document. I am
>> >innocent but the 'spell check' does not like passive voice and it
>> >ended like that when I checked my comments.
>> >
>> >Radu.
>> >
>> >>-----Original Message-----
>> >>From: Itzik Kitroser [mailto:itzikk@runcom.co.il]
>> >>Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 1:01 PM
>> >>To: stds-802-16-mobile@ieee.org
>> >>Subject: stds-802-16-mobile: Handoff Ad-Hoc, second iteration
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Hello all,
>> >>I have uploaded two documents to the upload site:
>> >>
>> >><http://download.mobile.wirelessman.org/Handoff Ad_02.doc>
>> >><http://download.mobile.wirelessman.org/Handoff
>> Ad_Issues_To_Discuss.doc>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>I have concentrated all the comments given in the "Handoff
>Ad_02.doc"
>> >>document.
>> >>The "Handoff Ad_Issues_To_Discuss.doc" document presents some
>> of the issues
>> >>that were commented as a response to the ********Handoff
>> >>Ad_01.doc******** document.
>> >>I have tried to raise a discussion about the major items in
>> "Handoff Ad_01",
>> >>but I might have skipped and item.
>> >>
>> >>Please provide feedback to the open items or items to be decided.
>> >>The intention here is to decide on some of the open items.
>> >>A specific detailed content about items is also welcome.
>> >>
>> >>Regards,
>> >>Itzik.
>