| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Prakash, Regarding the timeline, I
agree with you proposed schedule, and hope that we will manage to be productive
under the restricted time window. Today and tomorrow (Wednesday)
are holidays in Regards, Itzik. -----Original Message----- Hi Ronnykim - please see my thoughts inline
below. Rgds. -Prakash From: owner-stds-802-16-mobile@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16-mobile@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of ronnykim Dear All I have some questions regarding the document named "Definitions for
Handover Process Optimizations" which Yigal had presented before the closing plenary of Session #31. Would anyone please clarify the questions below. 1. At last page, The document will list-up contributions related to HO in
session #31. (see the title "List of documents in session #31
that were related to HO") Q1. Does it mean that the scope of the handover ad hoc
will be restricted within contributions of session #31?. >> Not necessarily. We will consider
all contributions that were deferred or rejected for lack of context in
Shenzhen. But we expect that these contributions will be updated
based on discussions in the next few weeks. Other (new) contributions will also
be needed to address gaps. Q2. If the scope is not restricted within the
contributions of session #31, I would like to know how new
contributions will be managed (e.g. procedures, timeline)? >> I sent out an email with
suggested timelines. 2. There are 2 different features in the table in the document :
"Basic", "Advanced". Q1. what are
differences between "Basic" and "Advanced"? for example) Basic-OFDMA vs
Advanced-OFDMA. >> Yigal / Yong Chang might have to annotate the document before
circulating so these terms are understood. 3. I would like to know what should be discussed by this Wednesday. To my understanding, if there are new items (e.g. type
of HO scenarios or terminologies not listed on the documents) to add
to the document, these issues can be emailed and fixed through the reflector by
Wednesday. Is my understanding correct? >> Wednesday is too aggressive so I have suggested a slightly
different timeline in my previous email. But please do start sending in
your thoughts so others can review and comment. Best Regards, Ronny (Yong-Ho) Kim LG Electronics inc. |