Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Ronnykim - please see my thoughts
inline below.
Rgds.
-Prakash From: owner-stds-802-16-mobile@listserv.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-16-mobile@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of ronnykim Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 10:17 PM To: STDS-802-16-MOBILE@listserv.ieee.org Subject: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [handoff] Questions to clarify Dear
All I have some questions regarding the
document named "Definitions for Handover Process Optimizations"
which Yigal had presented before the
closing plenary of Session #31. Would anyone please clarify the
questions below. 1. At last page, The document will
list-up contributions related to HO in session #31. (see the title
"List of documents in session #31 that were related to
HO")
Q1. Does it mean
that the scope of the handover ad hoc will be restricted within
contributions of session #31?. >> Not necessarily. We will
consider all contributions that were deferred or rejected for lack of
context in Shenzhen. But we expect that these contributions will
be updated based on discussions in the next few weeks. Other (new)
contributions will also be needed to address
gaps. Q2. If the scope
is not restricted within the contributions of session #31,
I would like to know how new contributions will be managed (e.g. procedures, timeline)? >> I sent out an email
with suggested
timelines. 2. There are 2 different features in
the table in the document : "Basic", "Advanced". Q1. what are
differences between "Basic" and "Advanced"? for example) Basic-OFDMA vs Advanced-OFDMA. >> Yigal / Yong
Chang might have to annotate the document before circulating so these
terms are understood. 3. I would like to know what should
be discussed by this Wednesday. To my
understanding, if there are new items (e.g. type of HO scenarios or terminologies
not listed on the
documents) to add to the document, these issues can be emailed
and fixed through the
reflector by Wednesday. Is my understanding correct? >> Wednesday is too
aggressive so I have suggested a slightly different timeline in my previous
email. But please do start sending in your thoughts so others can
review and comment. Best
Regards, Ronny (Yong-Ho)
Kim LG Electronics
inc. |