Re: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [Handoff] Multiple frequency assignment for the same sector (BS)
I also like option 2.
But if we take option 2, I think we also should clearfy the "single MAC instance" terminology.
Because the sector is exactly same as current 16d BS in option 2,
without well defined the "single MAC instance" terminology, I think we can not define inter-sector handover(handover optimization) in a "multi-sector BS family".
Changjae.
----- Original Message -----
From: <owner-stds-802-16-mobile@listserv.ieee.org>
To: <STDS-802-16-MOBILE@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [Handoff] Multiple frequency assignment for the same sector (BS)
> This isssue is not so simple as may look.
> I am not sure that current 802.16 standard supports having
> several [frequency] channels for a single MAC instance
> [I think, it does not]. Large part of the standard was
> written under assumption that e.g. same broadcast messges
> [like DL-MAPs] can be received by all SSs under BS control.
>
> If we want to make multi-frequency operations [per single MAC instance]
> possible, we have to examine very carefully the whole text of the standard
> to see that it is consistent.
>
> As REVd is closed, it might be a problem to develop [clean up] all topics
> needed for such functionality.
>
> Vladimir
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Stanwood
> To: STDS-802-16-MOBILE@listserv.ieee.org
> Sent: 6/8/2004 7:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [Handoff] Multiple frequency assignment
> for the same sector (BS)
>
> Be certain to add new fields as TLVs in a way that older (16d) equipment
> that receive the fields can ignore them and still operate correctly as
> fixed (rather than mobile) equipment.
>
> Ken
>
> _____
>
> From: owner-stds-802-16-mobile@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-16-mobile@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Mary
> Chion
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 11:04 PM
> To: STDS-802-16-MOBILE@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [Handoff] Multiple frequency assignment
> for the same sector (BS)
>
>
> All,
>
> This is a recap of the discussion for the multiple frequency assignement
> of the same sector. There are two options to handle this configuration:
>
> Option 1:
> Change the definition of a sector to allow multiple frequency
> assignments. This implies to change DCD message to include multiple
> FA_IDs and allow a handover type of intra-sector inter-frequency
> handoff.
>
> Option 2:
> The sector definition remains the same: a sector of single frequency
> assignment. The DCD message remains to include one FA_ID. For multiple
> frequency assignement for the same sector, each frequency channel will
> be the treated as a sector, hence, the identity of a sector should be
> defined as: BS ID, sector ID and FA_ID. The handover between frequencies
> can be treated the same as inter-sector inter-frequency handoff.
>
> Please provide your comments and hopefully, we can agree on one option.
>
> Mary Chion
>
>
>
> This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
>
> ************************************************************************
> ************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
> computer viruses.
> ************************************************************************
> ************
>
> This mail was sent via mail.alvarion.com
>
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
> ************************************************************************************
>
>
>