Everyone,
I have uploaded what I
believe are all the late handoff related contributions from the Shenzhen meeting
(# 108, 110 & 115) to the “handoff” upload directory. I have purposely
not put them in the TGe directory. Roger will fill that directory with the
Shenzhen material when he gets a chance (he’s been kind of busy with the RevD
sponsor ballot package).
One thing I want to
stress to everybody. Since this is an ad hoc there is no need to use
contribution numbers on documents submitted to the ad hoc unless the ad hoc
chair wants them. These are not contributions to either the Working Group
or Task Group and should NOT be using our normal numbering scheme unless you
plan on making it a contribution to the Task group. If you intend to do
so, Please use the
correct file naming format and numbering! This was one
of the biggest problems at the Shenzhen meeting and cause for a lot of
confusion. Some of you are putting IEEE prior to the file name and some of
you aren’t. Some of you are putting a dot in 802.16 and some of you
aren’t. Currently there are at least six different documents in the
handoff upload directory using the same -04_105 contribution number, a number
already used at the Shenzhen meeting for a document on MIMO. Please pay
attention to what you are doing, it will make life a lot simpler for
everyone.
Brian
From:
Iyer, Prakash
[mailto:prakash.iyer@INTEL.COM]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 3:58
PM
To:
STDS-802-16-MOBILE@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [Handoff]
Comments / contribs deferred/r ejected/withdrawn in Shenzhen to be considered by
handoff adhoc
Thanks for
the updates. Can you upload these contribs to the temporary file space for the
handoff adhoc group. If I remember correctly these were rejected as late
contribs so everyone might not have a copy.
-Prakash
From:
owner-stds-802-16-mobile@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16-mobile@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Mo-Han Fong
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 12:54
PM
To:
STDS-802-16-MOBILE@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [Handoff]
Comments / contribs deferred/r ejected/withdrawn in Shenzhen to be considered by
handoff adhoc
For comment #143, the
associated contribution is 04/110.
Please also add another
comment to your list: comment #40 (contrib. 04/108). This comment is related to
the Idle Handoff scenario.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
Iyer, Prakash
[mailto:prakash.iyer@INTEL.COM]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 9:58
AM
To:
STDS-802-16-MOBILE@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [Handoff]
Comments / contribs deferred/rejected/withdrawn in Shenzhen to be considered
by handoff adhoc
Following is a list of
comments sorted by ones without and with contributions that were either
rejected, withdrawn or deferred in Shenzhen but may be appropriate to be
considered by the Handoff adhoc group. Multiple comments on a line implies
that they are related.
Please review this list
and relevant contributions (preferably before our telecon on Mon/Tue) so we
can decide which ones will be resurrected over the next 2 weeks for revision
and inclusion as consensus text for the Portland plenary.
Comments
without contributions:
#06
#07
#11, 13, 16, 36, 38, 238
- Mobility agent related
#30 - was
withdrawn with no contribution
#56
#94
#109
#110
#111
#112
#113
#137, 239, 146, 151,
160, 168 - BS to BS signalling related
#143
#148 - subsumed by other
related comments, more an observation
#170 - Security
adhoc?
#201, 202, 212, 213 -
OFDMA PHY enhancements?
#204
#240
Comments
with contributions:
#05
(04/60r1)
#37
(04/58)
#42
(04/48)
#76
(04/75r2)
#98
(04/74)
#147
(04/55)
#101
(04/57)
#141
(04/87r1)
#152
(04/76)
#157
(04/90)
#237 (04/61)
#257
(04/65)
#258
(04/66)
#260
(04/68r2)
#261
(04/69)
Others:
Network reference model
to describe HO scenarios
Updates to
HO SDLs
Definition of soft
HO
Informative text on HO
performance analysis
-Prakash