Thanks for your response. This conforms my
understanding. However, I do not know why standard went in this direction.
This is, clearly, in-efficient from MAC
& overall system capacity perspective.
Am I missing some hidden strong rational
for this design ?
Thanks,
-Praveen
From: Phillip Barber
[mailto:pbarber@broadbandmobiletech.com]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 4:27
PM
To: Praveen Gupta;
STDS-802-16-MOBILE@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE]
CID -to- SFID mapping
Relationship between SFID and unicast transport CID is
unitary (see 6.3.1.1 PMP, page 14, line 25, in P80216/Cor1D4 which states:
'When admitted or active, service flows are uniquely associated with transport
connections.'). A unicast transport CID cannot have more than one SFID assigned
to it. Note that I am distinguishing unicast CIDs from multicast CIDs (see
Table 345 in P80216e/D10). Multicast CIDs can have multiple SFIDs assigned to
them (in the downlink only, of course).
Thanks,
Phillip Barber
Huawei
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, August 19,
2005 5:21 PM
Subject:
[STDS-802-16-MOBILE] CID -to- SFID mapping
Hi,
Does standard allows multiple SFID of same flow-type (such
as best-effort or nrt) to same CID ??
Thanks,
-Praveen