RE: stds-802-16-tg4: RE: stds-802-16: February Interim Meeting for theWirelessHUMAN T ask Group
You are partly right about "coexistence" Zion.
The WRC97 adopted primary allocation for active spaceborne sensors,
including Synthetic Aperture Radars, in the bands 5.25 to 5.35 GHz and 5.35
to 5.46GHz This latter systems "coexistence" is something the WLANs and
FWA PMP systems have to seriously consider as it is considerably different
than what the licensed bands have to contend with. Moreover the coexistence
definition of ETSI TM4 does not apply for unlicensed bands. ITU-R is very
actively pursuing the issue for the WRC 03 of WLANs and FWA interference
exceeding the SAR's interference requirements. ETSI BRAN is considering the
Hiperlan2 interference only to SARs but not to FWA. 802.16 and 11 have to
consider all systems sharing this bands; e.g., global "coexistence" of
RLANs, FWA, and SARS in the 5.25-5.35 GHz. Moreover for the unlicensed
bands the term coexistence does not mean the samething as in the licensed
band; e.g., the
Regards
Dr. Demosthenes J. Kostas
Director, Industry Standards
Adaptive Broadband Corporation
3314 Dartmouth Ave
Dallas, TX 75205 USA
tel: 214 520 8411
fax: 214 520 9802
-----Original Message-----
From: Zion Hadad [mailto:zionh@runcom.co.il]
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 11:30 PM
To: 'Marianna Goldhammer'; durga.satapathy@mail.sprint.com;
stds-802-16-tg4@ieee.org; stds-802-16@ieee.org
Cc: r.b.marks@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-802-16-tg4: RE: stds-802-16: February Interim Meeting
for theWirelessHUMAN T ask Group
Hi Mariaanna
There are several different because of the Co Existence with 802.11/15,
Anti-Jamming protection and the channel behavior.
I believe that in TG-4 we have more technical staff to consider ahead.
all the best to all
Zion Hadad
Runcom
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16-tg4@ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16-tg4@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Marianna Goldhammer
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 8:23 AM
To: durga.satapathy@mail.sprint.com; stds-802-16-tg4@ieee.org;
stds-802-16@ieee.org
Cc: r.b.marks@ieee.org
Subject: stds-802-16-tg4: RE: stds-802-16: February Interim Meeting for
theWirelessHUMAN T ask Group
Dear Durga,
I do not think that a system in 5GHz will be essentially different from one
in 2-11GHz.
Most of the 802.16 MAC modifications done for Sub11 will be relevant for
HUMAN also.
Probably also the PHY will not differ so much.
I fear that dot4 and dot3 try to invent the same wheel in the same time.
I think that HUMAN should first define what wants to achieve, and what is
really
different from dot3. Should start with the beginning. And follow mainly the
Sub11
achievements.
Cheers,
Marianna
BreezeCOM
-----Original Message-----
From: durga.satapathy@mail.sprint.com
[mailto:durga.satapathy@mail.sprint.com]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 11:21 PM
To: stds-802-16-tg4@ieee.org; stds-802-16@ieee.org
Cc: r.b.marks@ieee.org
Subject: stds-802-16: February Interim Meeting for the WirelessHUMAN Task
Group
All,
The IEEE 802.16 WirelessHUMAN Task Group will have a February Interim
meeting to narrow down the list of proposed modifications (to 802.16
MAC and 802.11a-HIPERLAN/2 PHY) that are received in response to the
current call for
tributions(
http://www.ieee802.org/16/tg4/docs/802164-00_01.pdf ) for the
WirelessHUMAN standard.
The meetings will take place in San Jose on February 15 and February
16. The WirelessHUMAN Task Group will meet from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
on Feb 15, and from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Feb 16. The exact meeting
venue and hotel arrangements are currently being finalized, and full
details will be posted early next week.
In order to facilitate arrangements for meeting rooms and hotel
arrangements, it is necessary to have an idea of the number of
attendees. If you are planning on attending this Interim meeting,
please inform me by email ASAP. Many thanks to Mika Kasslin of Nokia
for hosting this meeting for the WirelessHUMAN Task Group.
Regards, Durga Satapathy
Email: durga.satapathy@mail.sprint.com
Tel: (913) 534-6338
Fax: (913) 534-6522