RE: stds-802-16-tg4: RE: stds-802-16: February Interim Meeting for theWirelessHUMAN T ask Group
Marianna,
You are right that many of the 802.16 MAC modifications done for TG3
could be relevant for WirelessHUMAN. However, I believe there will be
significant differences between TG3 and WirelessHUMAN. The fact that
WirelessHUMAN operates in unlicensed spectrum brings in a number of
issues that do not exist in systems designed for licensed spectrum
(some of which have been pointed out by Zion).
While the issues that are common to TG3 and TG4 would hopefully make
our task easier, the two groups are indeed addressing different
problems. The goal and objectives for WirelessHUMAN have already been
defined in the PAR. The group has also identified specific MAC and PHY
modifications, as listed in its call for contributions
http://www.ieee802.org/16/tg4/docs/802164-00_01.pdf, that are not being
fully addressed elsewhere.
Thank you for your comments.
Regards, Durga
-----Original Message-----
From: zionh [mailto:zionh@runcom.co.il]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 1:30 AM
To: mariannag; durga.satapathy; stds-802-16-tg4; stds-802-16
Cc: zionh; r.b.marks
Subject: RE: stds-802-16-tg4: RE: stds-802-16: February Interim Meeting
for theWirelessHUMAN T ask Group
Hi Mariaanna
There are several different because of the Co Existence with 802.11/15,
Anti-Jamming protection and the channel behavior.
I believe that in TG-4 we have more technical staff to consider ahead.
all the best to all
Zion Hadad
Runcom
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16-tg4@ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16-tg4@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Marianna Goldhammer
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 8:23 AM
To: durga.satapathy@mail.sprint.com; stds-802-16-tg4@ieee.org;
stds-802-16@ieee.org
Cc: r.b.marks@ieee.org
Subject: stds-802-16-tg4: RE: stds-802-16: February Interim Meeting for
theWirelessHUMAN T ask Group
Dear Durga,
I do not think that a system in 5GHz will be essentially different from
one
in 2-11GHz.
Most of the 802.16 MAC modifications done for Sub11 will be relevant for
HUMAN also.
Probably also the PHY will not differ so much.
I fear that dot4 and dot3 try to invent the same wheel in the same
time.
I think that HUMAN should first define what wants to achieve, and what
is
really
different from dot3. Should start with the beginning. And follow
mainly the
Sub11
achievements.
Cheers,
Marianna
BreezeCOM
-----Original Message-----
From: durga.satapathy@mail.sprint.com
[mailto:durga.satapathy@mail.sprint.com]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 11:21 PM
To: stds-802-16-tg4@ieee.org; stds-802-16@ieee.org
Cc: r.b.marks@ieee.org
Subject: stds-802-16: February Interim Meeting for the WirelessHUMAN
Task
Group
All,
The IEEE 802.16 WirelessHUMAN Task Group will have a February Interim
meeting to narrow down the list of proposed modifications (to 802.16
MAC and 802.11a-HIPERLAN/2 PHY) that are received in response to the
current call for
tributions(
http://www.ieee802.org/16/tg4/docs/802164-00_01.pdf ) for the
WirelessHUMAN standard.
The meetings will take place in San Jose on February 15 and February
16. The WirelessHUMAN Task Group will meet from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
on Feb 15, and from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Feb 16. The exact meeting
venue and hotel arrangements are currently being finalized, and full
details will be posted early next week.
In order to facilitate arrangements for meeting rooms and hotel
arrangements, it is necessary to have an idea of the number of
attendees. If you are planning on attending this Interim meeting,
please inform me by email ASAP. Many thanks to Mika Kasslin of Nokia
for hosting this meeting for the WirelessHUMAN Task Group.
Regards, Durga Satapathy
Email: durga.satapathy@mail.sprint.com
Tel: (913) 534-6338
Fax: (913) 534-6522