Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: stds-802-16: ***IEEE 802.16 Working Group Letter Ballot #5:Announcement



Thanks for the clarification, although I would personally have hoped that a
Letter Ballot which could affect a member's status should only be initiated
after discussion and approval by the WG at a duly constituted meeting - or
at least approved on a contingency basis. Can you please specify which (or
how many) "key members" of the WG you discussed this with. I thought that
all members were equal (but some might be more equal than others ...)

I would still prefer to amend the motion on the letter ballot as proposed
(presumably as a friendly amendment) but I am willing to seek a seconder if
necessary. I believe that we should NOT be pre-supposing (or pre-judging)
the outcome of the meeting.

David Trinkwon
Email : Trinkwon@compuserve.com
USA Tel : 650 245 5650            Fax : 650 649 2728
UK   Tel : +44 (0)7802 538315  Fax : +44 (0)20 7504 3586



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:47 PM
To: stds-802-16@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-802-16: ***IEEE 802.16 Working Group Letter Ballot
#5:Announcement



>Roger - please clarify :
>
>a) Does (n0n)-participation in this Letter Ballot count against a member
for
>membership purposes ?

Yes, because it's a Working Group Letter Ballot.

>b) I understand that this proposal only authorizes the group to take the
>actions envisaged at the Closing Plenary, but does this preclude them from
>authorizing other possible courses of action during Meeting #19. ?

The motion would permit the WG to "carry out Working Group business".
This would allow courses of action outside the particular ones cited.
I think it covers the contingencies.

Roger


>If so then I would like to propose an amended Motion, such as below:
>
>"Procedural Motion: To authorize the IEEE 802.16 Working Group to
>carry out Working Group business at Session #19, with or without a
>formal quorum, and in particular to authorize the Working Group
>Closing Plenary, on 24 May 2002, to act as determined with a 75% majority
of
>those
>members present,  under PARs 802.16a and 802.16c."


>David Trinkwon
>Email : Trinkwon@compuserve.com
>USA Tel : 650 245 5650            Fax : 650 649 2728
>UK   Tel : +44 (0)7802 538315  Fax : +44 (0)20 7504 3586
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-stds-802-16@majordomo.ieee.org
>[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
>Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:16 PM
>To: stds-802-16@ieee.org
>Subject: stds-802-16: ***IEEE 802.16 Working Group Letter Ballot #5:
>Announcement
>
>
>
>This note announces IEEE 802.16 Working Group Letter Ballot #5.
>
>Procedural Motion: To authorize the IEEE 802.16 Working Group to
>carry out Working Group business at Session #19, with or without a
>formal quorum, and in particular to authorize the Working Group
>Closing Plenary, on 24 May 2002, to act, with a 75% majority of those
>members present, to adopt drafts and initiate Working Group Letter
>Ballots on those drafts under PARs 802.16a and 802.16c.
>
>Moved by:    Brian Kiernan
>Seconded by: Paul Struhsaker
>
>Opening date: 12 April 2002
>Closing date: 17 May 2002 (anywhere in the world)
>
>To cast your vote, use the following form:
>	http://ieee802.org/16/tga/ballot05/form.html