Re: [STDS-802-16] LE Ad-hoc - First working document and questions
Hi Marianna,
I would propose to include 2.4GHz in the study, because
although it is a noisy band, it has very good propagation and
better mobility than 5.8GHz.
Best Regards,
Yigal
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Marianna Goldhammer
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 8:56 PM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] LE Ad-hoc - First working document and questions
Hi All,
I started the work by looking at System Parameters:
- for Tx power and antenna gain, I used data sheets of
existing products, from some 5 companies; took the
most used ones
- for SCa, OFDM,OFDMA, I used D3 to get
performance parameters.
In the attached document you will find a proposal for
system parameters, some questions, a list of main
interference scenarios to look at, and in the Annex
relevant extracts from D3.
Please:
- comment on proposed parameters
- address the "yellow text" and provide OFDM and OFDMA
parameters for lowest rate ACI
- comment on scenarios
- propose how to evaluate "service disruption" cases.
Regards,
Marianna
IEEE 802.16 LE Ad-Hoc Chair
P.S. Feel free to insert comments in text
<<C802.16-04_NNr0.doc>>
This mail was sent via mail.alvarion.com
****************************************************************************
********
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
viruses.
****************************************************************************
********