[STDS-802-16] Reply Comments for IEEE P802.16-REVd/D4; Revised Comments invited
We received 1305 reply comments to the comments received in the
P802.16-REVd/D4 Sponsor Ballot recirculation.
These reply comments have been added to the comment package, which is
now available:
http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_20r2.zip
The file is set to open to a layout showing the replies, in
abbreviated form. If more than three replies were submitted for a
given comment, you will need to scroll to see them all. For a more
spacious view of the reply comments, click "See reply details" above
the colored Reply Comment table.
In accordance with the announced comment resolution procedures:
http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_18r1.pdf
those who submitted the original comments are now invited to
reconsider their comments in the light of:
(a) the reply comments
(b) other comments in the database that address relevant issues
To submit your revised comment, please follow the same procedure for
submitting Reply Comments, using the fields "Recommendation ", "
Proposed Resolution ", " Reason for Recommendation ", and "
Recommendation by". Email your revised comment files to
ballot16d@wirelessman.org by Wednesday 28 April AOE (Anywhere on
Earth).
ADVICE TO COMMENTORS:
In light of the defined procedure, there will be no opportunity for
the Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) to alter the revised comments;
the BRC can only accept or reject them. Therefore, those who
submitted comments are strongly encouraged to study the database, not
only with respect to their own comments but also with respect to
related comments. If you have a concern that related comments might
affect yours, please contact the other balloter to coordinate your
responses. Please ensure that your Suggested Remedy is fully
explicit, with detailed changes by page and line number, so that the
editor may implement it without doubt as to your intent. If your
comment refers to an external contribution, please refer to its
explicit contribution number, including the revision number, at
<http://ieee802.org/16/tgd/#Contributions>.
Please remember that your revised comment will be voted upon,
verbatim, by the BRC. The BRC members, when considering their vote,
will look to see whether your comment makes a convincing argument in
favor of the need for a change to the draft. They will also be
looking for evidence that you have fully addressed all concerns
raised in the reply comments and have considered alternatives
proposed there. You are encouraged eliminate any doubt the BRC
members have doubts about the change.
Please contact me with any questions.
Roger
--
Dr. Roger B. Marks <mailto:marks@nist.gov> +1 303 497 3037
National Institute of Standards and Technology/Boulder, CO, USA
Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on Broadband Wireless Access
<http://WirelessMAN.org>